Course Detail
Course Description
| Course | Code | Semester | T+P (Hour) | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REINFORCED CONCRETE II | - | Fall Semester | 3+0 | 3 | 5 |
| Course Program |
| Prerequisites Courses | |
| Recommended Elective Courses |
| Language of Course | Turkish |
| Course Level | First Cycle (Bachelor's Degree) |
| Course Type | Required |
| Course Coordinator | Assist.Prof. Ümit Necmettin ARIBAŞ |
| Name of Lecturer(s) | Assist.Prof. Ümit Necmettin ARIBAŞ |
| Assistant(s) | |
| Aim | To give information about the application of current code requirements, to give information about the design of reinforced concrete structures under the vertical and earthquake loads via Turkish Seismic Design Code and to give the ability of applying the knowledge of reinforced concrete on engineering problems. |
| Course Content | This course contains; Introduction,Design of one way reinforced concrete slabs supported by beams I,Design of two way reinforced concrete slabs supported by beams II,Joist slabs,Flat slabs,Earthquake effects and elastic equivalent earthquake load method,Earthquake effects; general design of beams, columns and shear walls,Staircases,Foundations, continuous footings, spread footings,Combined rigid footings and combined footings on elastic soil,Mat foundations, Constructive rules and detailing of foundations,Retaining walls,Retaining walls, deep beams,Deep beams, Expansion and seismic joints. |
| Dersin Öğrenme Kazanımları | Teaching Methods | Assessment Methods |
| Design of reinforced concrete slab systems | 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 2, 3, 9 | A, F, G |
| Design of reinforced concrete structures subjected to vertical and lateral loads defined by the codes | 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 2, 3, 9 | A, F, G |
| Design of the foundations of masonry structures | 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 2, 3, 9 | A, F, G |
| Design of retaining walls | 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 2, 3, 9 | A, F, G |
| Design the foundation of structures. | 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 2, 3, 9 | A, F, G |
| Teaching Methods: | 10: Discussion Method, 11: Demonstration Method, 12: Problem Solving Method, 14: Self Study Method, 16: Question - Answer Technique, 2: Project Based Learning Model, 3: Problem Baded Learning Model, 9: Lecture Method |
| Assessment Methods: | A: Traditional Written Exam, F: Project Task, G: Quiz |
Course Outline
| Order | Subjects | Preliminary Work |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction | |
| 2 | Design of one way reinforced concrete slabs supported by beams I | |
| 3 | Design of two way reinforced concrete slabs supported by beams II | |
| 4 | Joist slabs | |
| 5 | Flat slabs | |
| 6 | Earthquake effects and elastic equivalent earthquake load method | |
| 7 | Earthquake effects; general design of beams, columns and shear walls | |
| 8 | Staircases | |
| 9 | Foundations, continuous footings, spread footings | |
| 10 | Combined rigid footings and combined footings on elastic soil | |
| 11 | Mat foundations, Constructive rules and detailing of foundations | |
| 12 | Retaining walls | |
| 13 | Retaining walls, deep beams | |
| 14 | Deep beams, Expansion and seismic joints |
| Resources |
| • MacGregor, JG; Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, Prentice Hall, 2013. • J.C. McCormac, R.H. Brown, Design of reinforced concrete, Wiley, 2013. • J.K. Wight, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, Prentice Hall, 2015. • Celep, Z; Betonarme Yapılar (On birinci Baskı), Beta Yayım-Dağıtım, İstanbul. • TS500 Betonarme Yapıların Tasarım ve Yapım Kuralları, 2000. • TS-498 Yapı Elemanlarının Boyutlandırılmasında Alınacak Yüklerin Hesap Değerleri, 1997. • Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği, 2018. • Ersoy, U., Özcebe, G., Canbay, E; Betonarme Cilt: 2, Evrim Yayınevi • U. Ersoy; Betonarme 2 (Döşeme ve Temeller) 2019. • A. Doğangün, Betonarme Yapıların Hesap ve Tasarımı (On yedinci Baskı), Birsen Yayınevi. |
Course Contribution to Program Qualifications
| Course Contribution to Program Qualifications | |||||||
| No | Program Qualification | Contribution Level | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| 1 | An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. | X | |||||
| 2 | An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. | X | |||||
| 3 | An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. | X | |||||
| 4 | An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. | X | |||||
| 5 | An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. | ||||||
| 6 | An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. | X | |||||
| 7 | An ability to communicate effectively. | X | |||||
| 8 | A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning. | X | |||||
| 9 | An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. | X | |||||
| 10 | A knowledge of contemporary issues. | ||||||
| 11 | The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context. | ||||||
Assessment Methods
| Contribution Level | Absolute Evaluation | |
| Rate of Midterm Exam to Success | 30 | |
| Rate of Final Exam to Success | 70 | |
| Total | 100 | |
| ECTS / Workload Table | ||||||
| Activities | Number of | Duration(Hour) | Total Workload(Hour) | |||
| Course Hours | 14 | 1 | 14 | |||
| Guided Problem Solving | 14 | 2 | 28 | |||
| Resolution of Homework Problems and Submission as a Report | 1 | 12 | 12 | |||
| Term Project | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Presentation of Project / Seminar | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Quiz | 10 | 1 | 10 | |||
| Midterm Exam | 1 | 48 | 48 | |||
| General Exam | 1 | 48 | 48 | |||
| Performance Task, Maintenance Plan | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Total Workload(Hour) | 160 | |||||
| Dersin AKTS Kredisi = Toplam İş Yükü (Saat)/30*=(160/30) | 5 | |||||
| ECTS of the course: 30 hours of work is counted as 1 ECTS credit. | ||||||
Detail Informations of the Course
Course Description
| Course | Code | Semester | T+P (Hour) | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REINFORCED CONCRETE II | - | Fall Semester | 3+0 | 3 | 5 |
| Course Program |
| Prerequisites Courses | |
| Recommended Elective Courses |
| Language of Course | Turkish |
| Course Level | First Cycle (Bachelor's Degree) |
| Course Type | Required |
| Course Coordinator | Assist.Prof. Ümit Necmettin ARIBAŞ |
| Name of Lecturer(s) | Assist.Prof. Ümit Necmettin ARIBAŞ |
| Assistant(s) | |
| Aim | To give information about the application of current code requirements, to give information about the design of reinforced concrete structures under the vertical and earthquake loads via Turkish Seismic Design Code and to give the ability of applying the knowledge of reinforced concrete on engineering problems. |
| Course Content | This course contains; Introduction,Design of one way reinforced concrete slabs supported by beams I,Design of two way reinforced concrete slabs supported by beams II,Joist slabs,Flat slabs,Earthquake effects and elastic equivalent earthquake load method,Earthquake effects; general design of beams, columns and shear walls,Staircases,Foundations, continuous footings, spread footings,Combined rigid footings and combined footings on elastic soil,Mat foundations, Constructive rules and detailing of foundations,Retaining walls,Retaining walls, deep beams,Deep beams, Expansion and seismic joints. |
| Dersin Öğrenme Kazanımları | Teaching Methods | Assessment Methods |
| Design of reinforced concrete slab systems | 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 2, 3, 9 | A, F, G |
| Design of reinforced concrete structures subjected to vertical and lateral loads defined by the codes | 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 2, 3, 9 | A, F, G |
| Design of the foundations of masonry structures | 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 2, 3, 9 | A, F, G |
| Design of retaining walls | 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 2, 3, 9 | A, F, G |
| Design the foundation of structures. | 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 2, 3, 9 | A, F, G |
| Teaching Methods: | 10: Discussion Method, 11: Demonstration Method, 12: Problem Solving Method, 14: Self Study Method, 16: Question - Answer Technique, 2: Project Based Learning Model, 3: Problem Baded Learning Model, 9: Lecture Method |
| Assessment Methods: | A: Traditional Written Exam, F: Project Task, G: Quiz |
Course Outline
| Order | Subjects | Preliminary Work |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction | |
| 2 | Design of one way reinforced concrete slabs supported by beams I | |
| 3 | Design of two way reinforced concrete slabs supported by beams II | |
| 4 | Joist slabs | |
| 5 | Flat slabs | |
| 6 | Earthquake effects and elastic equivalent earthquake load method | |
| 7 | Earthquake effects; general design of beams, columns and shear walls | |
| 8 | Staircases | |
| 9 | Foundations, continuous footings, spread footings | |
| 10 | Combined rigid footings and combined footings on elastic soil | |
| 11 | Mat foundations, Constructive rules and detailing of foundations | |
| 12 | Retaining walls | |
| 13 | Retaining walls, deep beams | |
| 14 | Deep beams, Expansion and seismic joints |
| Resources |
| • MacGregor, JG; Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, Prentice Hall, 2013. • J.C. McCormac, R.H. Brown, Design of reinforced concrete, Wiley, 2013. • J.K. Wight, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, Prentice Hall, 2015. • Celep, Z; Betonarme Yapılar (On birinci Baskı), Beta Yayım-Dağıtım, İstanbul. • TS500 Betonarme Yapıların Tasarım ve Yapım Kuralları, 2000. • TS-498 Yapı Elemanlarının Boyutlandırılmasında Alınacak Yüklerin Hesap Değerleri, 1997. • Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği, 2018. • Ersoy, U., Özcebe, G., Canbay, E; Betonarme Cilt: 2, Evrim Yayınevi • U. Ersoy; Betonarme 2 (Döşeme ve Temeller) 2019. • A. Doğangün, Betonarme Yapıların Hesap ve Tasarımı (On yedinci Baskı), Birsen Yayınevi. |
Course Contribution to Program Qualifications
| Course Contribution to Program Qualifications | |||||||
| No | Program Qualification | Contribution Level | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| 1 | An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. | X | |||||
| 2 | An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. | X | |||||
| 3 | An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. | X | |||||
| 4 | An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. | X | |||||
| 5 | An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. | ||||||
| 6 | An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. | X | |||||
| 7 | An ability to communicate effectively. | X | |||||
| 8 | A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning. | X | |||||
| 9 | An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. | X | |||||
| 10 | A knowledge of contemporary issues. | ||||||
| 11 | The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context. | ||||||
Assessment Methods
| Contribution Level | Absolute Evaluation | |
| Rate of Midterm Exam to Success | 30 | |
| Rate of Final Exam to Success | 70 | |
| Total | 100 | |