Course Description
| Course | Code | Semester | T+P (Hour) | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTEMPORARY MUSEUM ARCHITECTURE | ARC3115247 | Fall Semester | 3+0 | 3 | 4 |
| Course Program | Salı 09:00-09:45 Salı 10:00-10:45 Salı 11:00-11:45 |
| Prerequisites Courses | |
| Recommended Elective Courses |
| Language of Course | English |
| Course Level | First Cycle (Bachelor's Degree) |
| Course Type | Elective |
| Course Coordinator | Assist.Prof. Bengi ATUN |
| Name of Lecturer(s) | Assist.Prof. Bengi ATUN |
| Assistant(s) | This is an undergraduate elective course which aims to introduce students to the multiple concerns of museum buildings as both artifacts that exist within a place and are viewed as cultural resources as well as spaces designed to house and exhibit artifacts of significance within them. |
| Aim | |
| Course Content | This course contains; Introduction to Course,Introduction to Museums,Introduction to Museum Experiences,Museum Visit,Space Syntax Part I,Space Syntax, Part II,Museum Visit,Evolution of Museum Buildings, Part I,Evolution of Museum Buildings Part II,Evolution of Museum Buildings Part III,Museum Visit,Museum Analysis Group Study,Student Presentations,Student Presentations. |
| Dersin Öğrenme Kazanımları | Teaching Methods | Assessment Methods |
| 1. The student is able to identify the various ways in which museum architecture influences visitor behavior. | 10, 4, 5, 9 | F |
| 2. The student is able to identify the evolution of the building typology through time. | 10, 2, 5, 9 | F |
| 3. The student is able to analyze a museum space in accordance with the 4 schemas used for analyzing space. | 10, 11, 9 | E |
| 4. The student is able to identify the place and significance of museum architecture within the multidisciplinary museum studies field. | 10, 4, 5, 6, 9 | F |
| 5. The student is able to summarize the important elements of space syntax theory and apply these theories on a museum building. | 10, 13, 5, 6, 9 | A, F |
| Teaching Methods: | 10: Discussion Method, 11: Demonstration Method, 13: Case Study Method, 2: Project Based Learning Model, 4: Inquiry-Based Learning, 5: Cooperative Learning, 6: Experiential Learning, 9: Lecture Method |
| Assessment Methods: | A: Traditional Written Exam, E: Homework, F: Project Task |
Course Outline
| Order | Subjects | Preliminary Work |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction to Course | |
| 2 | Introduction to Museums | Required Reading |
| 3 | Introduction to Museum Experiences | Required Reading |
| 4 | Museum Visit | Required Reading |
| 5 | Space Syntax Part I | Required Reading - Homework #1 Submission |
| 6 | Space Syntax, Part II | Required Reading |
| 7 | Museum Visit | Required Reading |
| 8 | Evolution of Museum Buildings, Part I | Required Reading - Homework #2 submission |
| 9 | Evolution of Museum Buildings Part II | Required Reading |
| 10 | Evolution of Museum Buildings Part III | Required Reading |
| 11 | Museum Visit | Required Reading |
| 12 | Museum Analysis Group Study | Bring Museum Plans to class |
| 13 | Student Presentations | Submission of Presentations |
| 14 | Student Presentations | Required Reading |
| Resources |
| 1. Paula Findlen, “The Museum: Its Classical Etymology and Renaissance Genealogy,” Journal of the History of Collections 1, no. 1 (January 1, 1989): 59–78. 2. Nikolaus Pevsner, “Chapter 8 Museums” in Nikolaus Pevsner, A History of Building Types, Reprint edition (Princeton University Press, 1979). Pp.111-139 3. Michaela Giebelhausen “Chapter 14, Museum Architecture: A Brief History” in Sharon Macdonald, ed., A Companion to Museum Studies, 1 edition (Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010). Pp. 223-245. 4. Eilean Hooper-Greenhill “Chapter 4 The Irrational Cabinet & Chapter 5 The Cabinet of the World” in Eilean Hooper-Greenhill, Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge (Routledge, 1992). Pp.78-132. 5. Carol Duncan and Alan Wallach, “The Universal Survey Museum,” Ariel 137 (1980): 212–199. 6. Douglas Davis, the Museum Transformed: Design and Culture in the Post-Pompidou Age (New York: Abbeville Press Inc., U.S., 1991). Chapter One, “The Museum Impossible” pp.11-37. 7. Steven Moyano, “Quality vs. History: Schinkel’s Altes Museum and Prussian Arts Policy,” Art Bulletin 72, no. 4 (December 1990): 585. 8. Theodore Ziolkowski, “Schinkel’s Museum: The Romantic Temple of Art,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 131, no. 4 (December 1987): 367–77. 9. Hermann G. Pundt, “K. F. Schinkel’s Environmental Planning of Central Berlin,” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 26, no. 2 (May 1, 1967): 114–30. 10. Bill Hillier and Kali Tzortzi “Space Syntax: The Language of Museum Space” in Macdonald, A Companion to Museum Studies. 11. Jocelyn Dodd, Tom Duncan, and Suzanne MacLeod, “New Museum Design Cultures: Harnessing the Potential of Design and ‘design Thinking’ in Museums,” Museum Management & Curatorship 30, no. 4 (October 2015): 314. 12. Juhani Pallasmaa, “Hapticity and Time,” Architectural Review 207, no. 1239 (May 2000): 78. 13. Juhani Pallasmaa, “An Architecture of the Seven Senses,” ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM-TOKYO-, 1994, 27–38. 14. Brian O’Doherty and Thomas McEvilley, Inside the White Cube: The Ideology of the Gallery Space, Expanded edition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000). 15. Beatriz Colomina, “The Endless Museum: Le Corbusier and Mies van Der Rohe,” Log, no. 15 (2009): 55–68. 16. D Gans, “Le Corbusier: An Atlas of Modern Landscapes,” JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE 19, no. 2 (April 2014): 300–304. 17. Andrew Mcclellan, Art Museum from Boullee to Bilbao, 1 edition (Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2008). 18. Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, “Manifesto of Futurism,” Le Figaro 20 (1909): 1. 19. George R. Collins, “The Visionary Tradition in Architecture,” The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 26, no. 8 (1968): 310–21. 20. Frank Lloyd Wright, The Mike Wallace Interview 1957. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0Yo2e-kRWM&list=RDY0Yo2e-kRWM#t=29 21. Jack Quinan, “Frank Lloyd Wright’s Guggenheim Museum: A Historian’s Report,” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 52, no. 4 (1993): 466–482. 22. Pavlos Philippou, “Cultural Buildings’ Genealogy of Originality: The Individual, the Unique and the Singular,” The Journal of Architecture 20, no. 6 (November 2, 2015): 1032–66. 23. Duncan F. Cameron, “The Museum, a Temple or the Forum1,” Curator: The Museum Journal 14, no. 1 (March 1, 1971): 11–24. 24. Beatriz Plaza and Silke N. Haarich, “The Guggenheim Museum Bilbao: Between Regional Embeddedness and Global Networking,” European Planning Studies 23, no. 8 (August 3, 2015): 1456–75. 25. Davis, The Museum Transformed. Chapter One, “The Museum Impossible” pp.11-37 and Chapter Two, “Paris, the Palace of Pleasure” pp.37-61. 26. Martin Heidenreich and Beatriz Plaza, “Renewal through Culture? The Role of Museums in the Renewal of Industrial Regions in Europe,” European Planning Studies 23, no. 8 (August 3, 2015): 1441–55. 27. Pavlos Philippou, “Cultural Buildings’ Genealogy of Originality: The Individual, the Unique and the Singular,” The Journal of Architecture 20, no. 6 (November 2, 2015): 1032–66. 28. Ferreira da Rocha e Silva and Ana Beatriz, “Chapter 3, Paris: The Nouvelle-Vague Years” in Ferreira da Rocha e Silva and Ana Beatriz, “Spectacular Architecture, Identity Crisis, Cultural Politics and the Reinvention of the Significance of Museums of Modern Art” (Ph.D., University of the Arts London, 2011), http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/5645/. Pp.216-356. 29. Wendy Shaw, “Museums and Narratives of Display from the Late Ottoman Empire to the Turkish Republic,” Muqarnas Online 24, no. 1 (2007): 253–279. 30. İbrahim; Amasya Üniversitesi Serbestoğlu Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Tarih Bölümü, Amasya, Türkiye and Turan; Amasya Üniversitesi Açik Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Tarih Bölümü, Amasya, Türkiye, “Osmanlı Devleti’nde modern bir okul projesi: Müze-i Hümâyûn Mektebi,” A modern school project in Ottoman State: Müze-i Hümâyûn (Imperial Museum) School 6, no. 12 (2013): 157. 31. İstanbul Arkeoloji Müzeleri, Official Website, http://www.istanbularkeoloji.gov.tr/tarihce. 32. Vittorio Magnago Lampugnani “Insight versus Entertainment: Untimely Meditations on the Architecture of Twentieth-century Art Museums” in Macdonald, A Companion to Museum Studies. 33. Davis, The Museum Transformed. Chapter Three, “The Museum After Pompidou: Imperialism, Populism, contradiction” pp.61-131. 34. Robert Venturi, Vincent Scully, and Arthur Drexler, Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture, 2nd edition (New York : Boston: The Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1977). 34.Silva and Beatriz, “Spectacular Architecture, Identity Crisis, Cultural Politics and the Reinvention of the Significance of Museums of Modern Art.” Chapter 3, “Paris: The Nouvelle-Vague Years” Pp.216-356 35. Jean-Francois Polo, “The Istanbul Modern Art Museum: An Urban Regeneration Project?,” European Planning Studies 23, no. 8 (August 2015): 1511–28. 36. Davis, The Museum Transformed. Chapter Four, “Adding, Reclaiming, Revising: The Museum Grows” in Ibid. 37. Suzanne Macleod, “Chapter 1, Rethinking Museum Architecture” in Suzanne Macleod, Reshaping Museum Space (Routledge, 2005). Pp.9-25 38. Douglas Davis, “Chapter five: the antimuseum: alternatives & Chapter Six: The Museum in the Next Century” in Ibid. 39. Vittorio Magnago Lampugnani and Angeli Sachs, eds., Museums for a New Millennium Concepts Projects Buildings (Munich ; New York: Prestel Publishing, 1999). Pp.1-14 40. Susanna Sirefman, “Formed and Forming: Contemporary Museum Architecture,” Daedalus, 1999. |
Course Contribution to Program Qualifications
| Course Contribution to Program Qualifications | |||||||
| No | Program Qualification | Contribution Level | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| 1 | DESIGN (Knowledge-Theoretical, Factual): During planning, implementation, management and supervision processes; Knowledge of creative problem defining and solving | ||||||
| 2 | DESIGN (Skill-Cognitive, Applied): Design-oriented research fiction, execution and evaluation of results and design process planning, management, application skills | ||||||
| 3 | DESIGN (Competencies-Ability to Work Independently and Take Responsibility): Ability to work within a team, to emphasize interdisciplinary interaction and apply technology-based business association methods | ||||||
| 4 | DESIGN (Competencies-Learning Competence): To evaluate critically the knowledge and skills gained in the field, to plan and to develop constantly professional knowledge, skills and approaches | X | |||||
| 5 | DESIGN (Competencies-Communication and Social Competence): Transferring design solutions as oral, written and visual (2D and 3D) presentations on national and international platforms | ||||||
| 6 | DESIGN (Competencies-Field Specific Competence): Contributing to the design of industrial products to improve the quality of life of the society. | X | |||||
| 7 | HISTORY, CULTURE, ART (Knowledge-Theoretical, Factual): To make connections between the information obtained by the analytical approach and the information on historical and cultural development and current situation in Turkey and in the world, and to expand the boundaries of vocational education proficiency to develop new ideas | X | |||||
| 8 | HISTORY, CULTURE, ART (Skill-Cognitive, Applied): Ability to solve the design related problems encountered in concept development, by using the knowledge gained in the field of history, culture and art | X | |||||
| 9 | HISTORY, CULTURE, ART (Competencies - Independent Work and Ability to Take Responsibility): To be able to do interdisciplinary work by using the knowledge gained in the field of history, culture and art | X | |||||
| 10 | HISTORY, CULTURE, ART (Competences-Learning Competence): Ability to develop the knowledge gained in the field in the direction needed, using the research methods | X | |||||
| 11 | HISTORY, CULTURE, ART (Competencies-Communication and Social Competence): Awareness of social and cultural phenomena and continuous change and arranging plans, strategies, projects, collaborations and activities for the social environment with social responsibility consciousness. | X | |||||
| 12 | MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY (Knowledge-Theoretical, Factual): To gain knowledge concerning technology, material, product and production methods - that is to be used in the solution of the problem related to the field. | ||||||
| 13 | MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY (Skill-Cognitive, Applied): Knowing materials, technology and production methods and developing designs compatible with these methods, proposing new technologies and production methods, developing creative design solutions by interpreting and using technology. | ||||||
| 14 | MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY (Competencies - Independent Work and Ability to Take Responsibility): To be able to work together with stakeholders working on different areas and needs in construction and production technologies | ||||||
| 15 | MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY (Competencies-Learning Competence): Understand the compatibility and flexibility between the technological tools that meet the requirements according to the needs | ||||||
| 16 | MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY (Competencies-Communication and Social Competence): Ability to use appropriate communication techniques and technologies | ||||||
| 17 | MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY (Competencies-Field Specific Competencies): Producing and applying knowledge to serve sustainable production and life | ||||||
| 18 | MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY (Competencies-Filed specific competencies): To be able to develop creative design solutions by mastering technological development, interpreting the developments and pioneering such developments. | ||||||
| 19 | PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES (Knowledge-Theoretical, Factual): -Ethics related to the field, -project management issues, -legal rights and responsibilities, -To gain knowledge about legal responsibilities and regulations affecting design works | ||||||
| 20 | PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES (Skill-Cognitive, Applied): Ability to recognize and apply the techniques used and legal responsibilities in planning, design, construction and operation phases of project management. | ||||||
| 21 | PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES (Competences - Capability to Work Independently and Take Responsibility): To adapt to the different working environments and forms required by the profession and to contribute to the development of these environments | ||||||
| 22 | PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES (Capabilities-Learning Capability): Monitoring and learning the legal, administrative and procedural requirements of design and construction projects throughout professional life, developing new strategic approaches in solving complex problems, taking responsibility | ||||||
| 23 | PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES (Competencies-Communication and Social Competence): Being able to lead the process -deploying the necessary communication skills and tools- during planning, designing, construction and operation stages, and demonstrating leadership in providing the solution in the work environment. | ||||||
| 24 | PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES (Competencies-Field Specific Competence): To be able to transfer knowledge to the level of expertise, to use theoretical and practical knowledge on the field of Professional Practice, Project Management and Legal responsibilities, knowledge of interdisciplinary interaction | ||||||
| 25 | ENVIRONMENT, STRUCTURE AND HUMAN HEALTH (Knowledge-Theoretic, Factual): Methods and techniques that will be used in the solution of the problems related to the field – to gain knowledge to apply the techniques in the context of environmental health, -building health, -human health | ||||||
| 26 | ENVIRONMENT, STRUCTURE, HUMAN HEALTH (Skill-Cognitive, Applied): Understanding the relationships between environment, structure and human health and creating solutions to related design problems. | ||||||
| 27 | ENVIRONMENT, STRUCTURE, HUMAN HEALTH (Competences - Capability to Work Independently and Take Responsibility): Taking competence and responsibility in the fields of urban / space / product planning, design, implementation and supervision of environment, strcuture and human health | ||||||
| 28 | ENVIRONMENT, STRUCTURE, HUMAN HEALTH (Capabilities-Learning Capability): Competence in researching theoretical and applied information systems on environment, structure and human health | ||||||
| 29 | ENVIRONMENT, STRUCTURE, HUMAN HEALTH (Competencies-Communication and Social Competence): Be able to communicate with all areas of expertise in environment, structure and human health | ||||||
Assessment Methods
| Contribution Level | Absolute Evaluation | |
| Rate of Midterm Exam to Success | 50 | |
| Rate of Final Exam to Success | 50 | |
| Total | 100 | |
| ECTS / Workload Table | ||||||
| Activities | Number of | Duration(Hour) | Total Workload(Hour) | |||
| Course Hours | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Guided Problem Solving | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Resolution of Homework Problems and Submission as a Report | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Term Project | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Presentation of Project / Seminar | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Quiz | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Midterm Exam | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| General Exam | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Performance Task, Maintenance Plan | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Total Workload(Hour) | 0 | |||||
| Dersin AKTS Kredisi = Toplam İş Yükü (Saat)/30*=(0/30) | 0 | |||||
| ECTS of the course: 30 hours of work is counted as 1 ECTS credit. | ||||||
Detail Informations of the Course
Course Description
| Course | Code | Semester | T+P (Hour) | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTEMPORARY MUSEUM ARCHITECTURE | ARC3115247 | Fall Semester | 3+0 | 3 | 4 |
| Course Program | Salı 09:00-09:45 Salı 10:00-10:45 Salı 11:00-11:45 |
| Prerequisites Courses | |
| Recommended Elective Courses |
| Language of Course | English |
| Course Level | First Cycle (Bachelor's Degree) |
| Course Type | Elective |
| Course Coordinator | Assist.Prof. Bengi ATUN |
| Name of Lecturer(s) | Assist.Prof. Bengi ATUN |
| Assistant(s) | This is an undergraduate elective course which aims to introduce students to the multiple concerns of museum buildings as both artifacts that exist within a place and are viewed as cultural resources as well as spaces designed to house and exhibit artifacts of significance within them. |
| Aim | |
| Course Content | This course contains; Introduction to Course,Introduction to Museums,Introduction to Museum Experiences,Museum Visit,Space Syntax Part I,Space Syntax, Part II,Museum Visit,Evolution of Museum Buildings, Part I,Evolution of Museum Buildings Part II,Evolution of Museum Buildings Part III,Museum Visit,Museum Analysis Group Study,Student Presentations,Student Presentations. |
| Dersin Öğrenme Kazanımları | Teaching Methods | Assessment Methods |
| 1. The student is able to identify the various ways in which museum architecture influences visitor behavior. | 10, 4, 5, 9 | F |
| 2. The student is able to identify the evolution of the building typology through time. | 10, 2, 5, 9 | F |
| 3. The student is able to analyze a museum space in accordance with the 4 schemas used for analyzing space. | 10, 11, 9 | E |
| 4. The student is able to identify the place and significance of museum architecture within the multidisciplinary museum studies field. | 10, 4, 5, 6, 9 | F |
| 5. The student is able to summarize the important elements of space syntax theory and apply these theories on a museum building. | 10, 13, 5, 6, 9 | A, F |
| Teaching Methods: | 10: Discussion Method, 11: Demonstration Method, 13: Case Study Method, 2: Project Based Learning Model, 4: Inquiry-Based Learning, 5: Cooperative Learning, 6: Experiential Learning, 9: Lecture Method |
| Assessment Methods: | A: Traditional Written Exam, E: Homework, F: Project Task |
Course Outline
| Order | Subjects | Preliminary Work |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction to Course | |
| 2 | Introduction to Museums | Required Reading |
| 3 | Introduction to Museum Experiences | Required Reading |
| 4 | Museum Visit | Required Reading |
| 5 | Space Syntax Part I | Required Reading - Homework #1 Submission |
| 6 | Space Syntax, Part II | Required Reading |
| 7 | Museum Visit | Required Reading |
| 8 | Evolution of Museum Buildings, Part I | Required Reading - Homework #2 submission |
| 9 | Evolution of Museum Buildings Part II | Required Reading |
| 10 | Evolution of Museum Buildings Part III | Required Reading |
| 11 | Museum Visit | Required Reading |
| 12 | Museum Analysis Group Study | Bring Museum Plans to class |
| 13 | Student Presentations | Submission of Presentations |
| 14 | Student Presentations | Required Reading |
| Resources |
| 1. Paula Findlen, “The Museum: Its Classical Etymology and Renaissance Genealogy,” Journal of the History of Collections 1, no. 1 (January 1, 1989): 59–78. 2. Nikolaus Pevsner, “Chapter 8 Museums” in Nikolaus Pevsner, A History of Building Types, Reprint edition (Princeton University Press, 1979). Pp.111-139 3. Michaela Giebelhausen “Chapter 14, Museum Architecture: A Brief History” in Sharon Macdonald, ed., A Companion to Museum Studies, 1 edition (Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010). Pp. 223-245. 4. Eilean Hooper-Greenhill “Chapter 4 The Irrational Cabinet & Chapter 5 The Cabinet of the World” in Eilean Hooper-Greenhill, Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge (Routledge, 1992). Pp.78-132. 5. Carol Duncan and Alan Wallach, “The Universal Survey Museum,” Ariel 137 (1980): 212–199. 6. Douglas Davis, the Museum Transformed: Design and Culture in the Post-Pompidou Age (New York: Abbeville Press Inc., U.S., 1991). Chapter One, “The Museum Impossible” pp.11-37. 7. Steven Moyano, “Quality vs. History: Schinkel’s Altes Museum and Prussian Arts Policy,” Art Bulletin 72, no. 4 (December 1990): 585. 8. Theodore Ziolkowski, “Schinkel’s Museum: The Romantic Temple of Art,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 131, no. 4 (December 1987): 367–77. 9. Hermann G. Pundt, “K. F. Schinkel’s Environmental Planning of Central Berlin,” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 26, no. 2 (May 1, 1967): 114–30. 10. Bill Hillier and Kali Tzortzi “Space Syntax: The Language of Museum Space” in Macdonald, A Companion to Museum Studies. 11. Jocelyn Dodd, Tom Duncan, and Suzanne MacLeod, “New Museum Design Cultures: Harnessing the Potential of Design and ‘design Thinking’ in Museums,” Museum Management & Curatorship 30, no. 4 (October 2015): 314. 12. Juhani Pallasmaa, “Hapticity and Time,” Architectural Review 207, no. 1239 (May 2000): 78. 13. Juhani Pallasmaa, “An Architecture of the Seven Senses,” ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM-TOKYO-, 1994, 27–38. 14. Brian O’Doherty and Thomas McEvilley, Inside the White Cube: The Ideology of the Gallery Space, Expanded edition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000). 15. Beatriz Colomina, “The Endless Museum: Le Corbusier and Mies van Der Rohe,” Log, no. 15 (2009): 55–68. 16. D Gans, “Le Corbusier: An Atlas of Modern Landscapes,” JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE 19, no. 2 (April 2014): 300–304. 17. Andrew Mcclellan, Art Museum from Boullee to Bilbao, 1 edition (Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2008). 18. Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, “Manifesto of Futurism,” Le Figaro 20 (1909): 1. 19. George R. Collins, “The Visionary Tradition in Architecture,” The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 26, no. 8 (1968): 310–21. 20. Frank Lloyd Wright, The Mike Wallace Interview 1957. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0Yo2e-kRWM&list=RDY0Yo2e-kRWM#t=29 21. Jack Quinan, “Frank Lloyd Wright’s Guggenheim Museum: A Historian’s Report,” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 52, no. 4 (1993): 466–482. 22. Pavlos Philippou, “Cultural Buildings’ Genealogy of Originality: The Individual, the Unique and the Singular,” The Journal of Architecture 20, no. 6 (November 2, 2015): 1032–66. 23. Duncan F. Cameron, “The Museum, a Temple or the Forum1,” Curator: The Museum Journal 14, no. 1 (March 1, 1971): 11–24. 24. Beatriz Plaza and Silke N. Haarich, “The Guggenheim Museum Bilbao: Between Regional Embeddedness and Global Networking,” European Planning Studies 23, no. 8 (August 3, 2015): 1456–75. 25. Davis, The Museum Transformed. Chapter One, “The Museum Impossible” pp.11-37 and Chapter Two, “Paris, the Palace of Pleasure” pp.37-61. 26. Martin Heidenreich and Beatriz Plaza, “Renewal through Culture? The Role of Museums in the Renewal of Industrial Regions in Europe,” European Planning Studies 23, no. 8 (August 3, 2015): 1441–55. 27. Pavlos Philippou, “Cultural Buildings’ Genealogy of Originality: The Individual, the Unique and the Singular,” The Journal of Architecture 20, no. 6 (November 2, 2015): 1032–66. 28. Ferreira da Rocha e Silva and Ana Beatriz, “Chapter 3, Paris: The Nouvelle-Vague Years” in Ferreira da Rocha e Silva and Ana Beatriz, “Spectacular Architecture, Identity Crisis, Cultural Politics and the Reinvention of the Significance of Museums of Modern Art” (Ph.D., University of the Arts London, 2011), http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/5645/. Pp.216-356. 29. Wendy Shaw, “Museums and Narratives of Display from the Late Ottoman Empire to the Turkish Republic,” Muqarnas Online 24, no. 1 (2007): 253–279. 30. İbrahim; Amasya Üniversitesi Serbestoğlu Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Tarih Bölümü, Amasya, Türkiye and Turan; Amasya Üniversitesi Açik Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Tarih Bölümü, Amasya, Türkiye, “Osmanlı Devleti’nde modern bir okul projesi: Müze-i Hümâyûn Mektebi,” A modern school project in Ottoman State: Müze-i Hümâyûn (Imperial Museum) School 6, no. 12 (2013): 157. 31. İstanbul Arkeoloji Müzeleri, Official Website, http://www.istanbularkeoloji.gov.tr/tarihce. 32. Vittorio Magnago Lampugnani “Insight versus Entertainment: Untimely Meditations on the Architecture of Twentieth-century Art Museums” in Macdonald, A Companion to Museum Studies. 33. Davis, The Museum Transformed. Chapter Three, “The Museum After Pompidou: Imperialism, Populism, contradiction” pp.61-131. 34. Robert Venturi, Vincent Scully, and Arthur Drexler, Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture, 2nd edition (New York : Boston: The Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1977). 34.Silva and Beatriz, “Spectacular Architecture, Identity Crisis, Cultural Politics and the Reinvention of the Significance of Museums of Modern Art.” Chapter 3, “Paris: The Nouvelle-Vague Years” Pp.216-356 35. Jean-Francois Polo, “The Istanbul Modern Art Museum: An Urban Regeneration Project?,” European Planning Studies 23, no. 8 (August 2015): 1511–28. 36. Davis, The Museum Transformed. Chapter Four, “Adding, Reclaiming, Revising: The Museum Grows” in Ibid. 37. Suzanne Macleod, “Chapter 1, Rethinking Museum Architecture” in Suzanne Macleod, Reshaping Museum Space (Routledge, 2005). Pp.9-25 38. Douglas Davis, “Chapter five: the antimuseum: alternatives & Chapter Six: The Museum in the Next Century” in Ibid. 39. Vittorio Magnago Lampugnani and Angeli Sachs, eds., Museums for a New Millennium Concepts Projects Buildings (Munich ; New York: Prestel Publishing, 1999). Pp.1-14 40. Susanna Sirefman, “Formed and Forming: Contemporary Museum Architecture,” Daedalus, 1999. |
Course Contribution to Program Qualifications
| Course Contribution to Program Qualifications | |||||||
| No | Program Qualification | Contribution Level | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| 1 | DESIGN (Knowledge-Theoretical, Factual): During planning, implementation, management and supervision processes; Knowledge of creative problem defining and solving | ||||||
| 2 | DESIGN (Skill-Cognitive, Applied): Design-oriented research fiction, execution and evaluation of results and design process planning, management, application skills | ||||||
| 3 | DESIGN (Competencies-Ability to Work Independently and Take Responsibility): Ability to work within a team, to emphasize interdisciplinary interaction and apply technology-based business association methods | ||||||
| 4 | DESIGN (Competencies-Learning Competence): To evaluate critically the knowledge and skills gained in the field, to plan and to develop constantly professional knowledge, skills and approaches | X | |||||
| 5 | DESIGN (Competencies-Communication and Social Competence): Transferring design solutions as oral, written and visual (2D and 3D) presentations on national and international platforms | ||||||
| 6 | DESIGN (Competencies-Field Specific Competence): Contributing to the design of industrial products to improve the quality of life of the society. | X | |||||
| 7 | HISTORY, CULTURE, ART (Knowledge-Theoretical, Factual): To make connections between the information obtained by the analytical approach and the information on historical and cultural development and current situation in Turkey and in the world, and to expand the boundaries of vocational education proficiency to develop new ideas | X | |||||
| 8 | HISTORY, CULTURE, ART (Skill-Cognitive, Applied): Ability to solve the design related problems encountered in concept development, by using the knowledge gained in the field of history, culture and art | X | |||||
| 9 | HISTORY, CULTURE, ART (Competencies - Independent Work and Ability to Take Responsibility): To be able to do interdisciplinary work by using the knowledge gained in the field of history, culture and art | X | |||||
| 10 | HISTORY, CULTURE, ART (Competences-Learning Competence): Ability to develop the knowledge gained in the field in the direction needed, using the research methods | X | |||||
| 11 | HISTORY, CULTURE, ART (Competencies-Communication and Social Competence): Awareness of social and cultural phenomena and continuous change and arranging plans, strategies, projects, collaborations and activities for the social environment with social responsibility consciousness. | X | |||||
| 12 | MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY (Knowledge-Theoretical, Factual): To gain knowledge concerning technology, material, product and production methods - that is to be used in the solution of the problem related to the field. | ||||||
| 13 | MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY (Skill-Cognitive, Applied): Knowing materials, technology and production methods and developing designs compatible with these methods, proposing new technologies and production methods, developing creative design solutions by interpreting and using technology. | ||||||
| 14 | MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY (Competencies - Independent Work and Ability to Take Responsibility): To be able to work together with stakeholders working on different areas and needs in construction and production technologies | ||||||
| 15 | MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY (Competencies-Learning Competence): Understand the compatibility and flexibility between the technological tools that meet the requirements according to the needs | ||||||
| 16 | MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY (Competencies-Communication and Social Competence): Ability to use appropriate communication techniques and technologies | ||||||
| 17 | MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY (Competencies-Field Specific Competencies): Producing and applying knowledge to serve sustainable production and life | ||||||
| 18 | MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY (Competencies-Filed specific competencies): To be able to develop creative design solutions by mastering technological development, interpreting the developments and pioneering such developments. | ||||||
| 19 | PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES (Knowledge-Theoretical, Factual): -Ethics related to the field, -project management issues, -legal rights and responsibilities, -To gain knowledge about legal responsibilities and regulations affecting design works | ||||||
| 20 | PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES (Skill-Cognitive, Applied): Ability to recognize and apply the techniques used and legal responsibilities in planning, design, construction and operation phases of project management. | ||||||
| 21 | PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES (Competences - Capability to Work Independently and Take Responsibility): To adapt to the different working environments and forms required by the profession and to contribute to the development of these environments | ||||||
| 22 | PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES (Capabilities-Learning Capability): Monitoring and learning the legal, administrative and procedural requirements of design and construction projects throughout professional life, developing new strategic approaches in solving complex problems, taking responsibility | ||||||
| 23 | PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES (Competencies-Communication and Social Competence): Being able to lead the process -deploying the necessary communication skills and tools- during planning, designing, construction and operation stages, and demonstrating leadership in providing the solution in the work environment. | ||||||
| 24 | PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES (Competencies-Field Specific Competence): To be able to transfer knowledge to the level of expertise, to use theoretical and practical knowledge on the field of Professional Practice, Project Management and Legal responsibilities, knowledge of interdisciplinary interaction | ||||||
| 25 | ENVIRONMENT, STRUCTURE AND HUMAN HEALTH (Knowledge-Theoretic, Factual): Methods and techniques that will be used in the solution of the problems related to the field – to gain knowledge to apply the techniques in the context of environmental health, -building health, -human health | ||||||
| 26 | ENVIRONMENT, STRUCTURE, HUMAN HEALTH (Skill-Cognitive, Applied): Understanding the relationships between environment, structure and human health and creating solutions to related design problems. | ||||||
| 27 | ENVIRONMENT, STRUCTURE, HUMAN HEALTH (Competences - Capability to Work Independently and Take Responsibility): Taking competence and responsibility in the fields of urban / space / product planning, design, implementation and supervision of environment, strcuture and human health | ||||||
| 28 | ENVIRONMENT, STRUCTURE, HUMAN HEALTH (Capabilities-Learning Capability): Competence in researching theoretical and applied information systems on environment, structure and human health | ||||||
| 29 | ENVIRONMENT, STRUCTURE, HUMAN HEALTH (Competencies-Communication and Social Competence): Be able to communicate with all areas of expertise in environment, structure and human health | ||||||
Assessment Methods
| Contribution Level | Absolute Evaluation | |
| Rate of Midterm Exam to Success | 50 | |
| Rate of Final Exam to Success | 50 | |
| Total | 100 | |