Course Description
| Course | Code | Semester | T+P (Hour) | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIRST EXAMINATION on PETITIONS in ADMISITRATIVE JUSTİCE | KHKD1212195 | Spring Semester | 3+0 | 3 | 8 |
| Course Program | Salı 10:00-10:45 Salı 11:00-11:45 Salı 12:00-12:45 |
| Prerequisites Courses | |
| Recommended Elective Courses |
| Language of Course | Turkish |
| Course Level | Third Cycle (Doctorate Degree) |
| Course Type | Required |
| Course Coordinator | Prof.Dr. Halit Eyüp ÖZDEMİR |
| Name of Lecturer(s) | Prof.Dr. Halit Eyüp ÖZDEMİR, Assist.Prof. Sinan SEÇKİN |
| Assistant(s) | Research Assistant. Melih Koç; Research Assistant. M. Furkan Yılmaz; Research Assistant. Beyza Ceren Sevindik |
| Aim | It aims to provide students with competence in the initial examination of the petitions submitted in the Administrative Judiciary. |
| Course Content | This course contains; Element of duty in the first examination,The element of jurisdiction in the first examination,Administrative authority encroachment,capacity to sue,A definitive and mandatory action that may be subject to administrative litigation,term of litigation ,hostility,Compliance with Articles 3 and 5 of the Administrative Procedure Law,Opening the case and reviewing the petition,The principle of ex officio investigation in administrative justice,Order of first review,Decisions upon review,Recourse against the decisions to be rendered upon the first review,Judicial decision review. |
| Dersin Öğrenme Kazanımları | Teaching Methods | Assessment Methods |
| Explains how to file lawsuits in administrative jurisdiction. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| Explains the rules of duty and authority in the first examination in administrative jurisdiction. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| Explains the rules and consequences of administrative authority encroachment in the first review in administrative jurisdiction. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| In administrative jurisdiction, he is familiar with the rules on capacity to sue and term of litigation in the first review. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| It determines the final and compulsory transactions that may be subject to administrative litigation in the first examination in administrative jurisdiction. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| Explains the rules of antagonism in the first examination in administrative jurisdiction. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| Evaluates the compliance of disputes with Articles 3 and 5 of the Administrative Procedure Law. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| Knows the procedure of the first examination and the decisions to be made as a result of the first examination. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| Teaching Methods: | 16: Question - Answer Technique, 9: Lecture Method |
| Assessment Methods: | A: Traditional Written Exam, E: Homework |
Course Outline
| Order | Subjects | Preliminary Work |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Element of duty in the first examination | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 5-10. |
| 2 | The element of jurisdiction in the first examination | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 11-16. |
| 3 | Administrative authority encroachment | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 17-21. |
| 4 | capacity to sue | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 22-42. |
| 5 | A definitive and mandatory action that may be subject to administrative litigation | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 43-49. |
| 6 | term of litigation | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 50-66. |
| 7 | hostility | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 67-72. |
| 8 | Compliance with Articles 3 and 5 of the Administrative Procedure Law | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 73-77. |
| 9 | Opening the case and reviewing the petition | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 78-86. |
| 10 | The principle of ex officio investigation in administrative justice | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 82-84. |
| 11 | Order of first review | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 85-86. |
| 12 | Decisions upon review | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 87-108. |
| 13 | Recourse against the decisions to be rendered upon the first review | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 110-113. |
| 14 | Judicial decision review | Examines the sample judicial decision by researching |
| Resources |
| Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019. "Administrative Trial Procedure Law with Explanations and Notes" Prof. Dr. Turan Yıldırım, Gül Fiş Üstün, Istanbul 2020. "Turkish Administrative Trial Law" Bahtiyar Akyılmaz, Murat Sezginer, Cemil Kaya, Istanbul 2022. |
Course Contribution to Program Qualifications
| Course Contribution to Program Qualifications | |||||||
| No | Program Qualification | Contribution Level | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| 1 | PY1) In light of the current developments in the field of public law, develop and deepen the knowledge about the main sources, legislation and jurisprudence which related to the public law. | X | |||||
| 2 | PY2) With understanding relationships among concept, institution and method that related to disciplines of public law, come up with original solutions by using knowledge requiring proficiency on analysis, synthesis and assessment of new and complex ideas. | X | |||||
| 3 | PY3) Evaluate and use new information within the public law in a systematic approach | X | |||||
| 4 | PY4) Evaluate innovative aproach an already known knowledge about public law or research and implement an original subject. | X | |||||
| 5 | PY5) Solve the problems encountered in the legal theory and practice by using research methods that specific to field of law. | X | |||||
| 6 | PY6) Evaluate innovative aproach an already known knowledge about public law or carry out an independent study which needs expertise in the field of public law and its sub-disciplines. | ||||||
| 7 | PY7) Develop different perspectives and take responsibility to solve complex issues which require expertise and encountered in the field of public law and its sub-disciplines. | X | |||||
| 8 | PY8) Develop new ideas and methods in the field of public law by using high level mental processes such as creative and critical thinking, problem solving and decision making. | X | |||||
| 9 | PY9) Defend original views when exchanging ideas in the field of public law and itssub-disciplines with professionals and communicate effectively by showing competence in the field. | ||||||
| 10 | PY10)Ability to communicate and discuss orally, in written and visually with peers by using a foreign language at least at a level of European Language Portfolio C1 General Level. | ||||||
| 11 | PY11) Demonstrate functional interaction by using strategic decision making processes in solving problems encountered in the field of law. | X | |||||
| 12 | PY12) With developing understanding of honesty, justice and ethics are required to be lawyer, teach around them. | X | |||||
| 13 | PY13)Contribute to the solution finding process regarding social, scientific, cultural and ethical problems in the field of law and support the development of these values. | X | |||||
Assessment Methods
| Contribution Level | Absolute Evaluation | |
| Rate of Midterm Exam to Success | 50 | |
| Rate of Final Exam to Success | 50 | |
| Total | 100 | |
| ECTS / Workload Table | ||||||
| Activities | Number of | Duration(Hour) | Total Workload(Hour) | |||
| Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 | |||
| Guided Problem Solving | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Resolution of Homework Problems and Submission as a Report | 14 | 1 | 14 | |||
| Term Project | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Presentation of Project / Seminar | 1 | 40 | 40 | |||
| Quiz | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Midterm Exam | 1 | 60 | 60 | |||
| General Exam | 1 | 70 | 70 | |||
| Performance Task, Maintenance Plan | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Total Workload(Hour) | 226 | |||||
| Dersin AKTS Kredisi = Toplam İş Yükü (Saat)/30*=(226/30) | 8 | |||||
| ECTS of the course: 30 hours of work is counted as 1 ECTS credit. | ||||||
Detail Informations of the Course
Course Description
| Course | Code | Semester | T+P (Hour) | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIRST EXAMINATION on PETITIONS in ADMISITRATIVE JUSTİCE | KHKD1212195 | Spring Semester | 3+0 | 3 | 8 |
| Course Program | Salı 10:00-10:45 Salı 11:00-11:45 Salı 12:00-12:45 |
| Prerequisites Courses | |
| Recommended Elective Courses |
| Language of Course | Turkish |
| Course Level | Third Cycle (Doctorate Degree) |
| Course Type | Required |
| Course Coordinator | Prof.Dr. Halit Eyüp ÖZDEMİR |
| Name of Lecturer(s) | Prof.Dr. Halit Eyüp ÖZDEMİR, Assist.Prof. Sinan SEÇKİN |
| Assistant(s) | Research Assistant. Melih Koç; Research Assistant. M. Furkan Yılmaz; Research Assistant. Beyza Ceren Sevindik |
| Aim | It aims to provide students with competence in the initial examination of the petitions submitted in the Administrative Judiciary. |
| Course Content | This course contains; Element of duty in the first examination,The element of jurisdiction in the first examination,Administrative authority encroachment,capacity to sue,A definitive and mandatory action that may be subject to administrative litigation,term of litigation ,hostility,Compliance with Articles 3 and 5 of the Administrative Procedure Law,Opening the case and reviewing the petition,The principle of ex officio investigation in administrative justice,Order of first review,Decisions upon review,Recourse against the decisions to be rendered upon the first review,Judicial decision review. |
| Dersin Öğrenme Kazanımları | Teaching Methods | Assessment Methods |
| Explains how to file lawsuits in administrative jurisdiction. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| Explains the rules of duty and authority in the first examination in administrative jurisdiction. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| Explains the rules and consequences of administrative authority encroachment in the first review in administrative jurisdiction. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| In administrative jurisdiction, he is familiar with the rules on capacity to sue and term of litigation in the first review. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| It determines the final and compulsory transactions that may be subject to administrative litigation in the first examination in administrative jurisdiction. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| Explains the rules of antagonism in the first examination in administrative jurisdiction. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| Evaluates the compliance of disputes with Articles 3 and 5 of the Administrative Procedure Law. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| Knows the procedure of the first examination and the decisions to be made as a result of the first examination. | 16, 9 | A, E |
| Teaching Methods: | 16: Question - Answer Technique, 9: Lecture Method |
| Assessment Methods: | A: Traditional Written Exam, E: Homework |
Course Outline
| Order | Subjects | Preliminary Work |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Element of duty in the first examination | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 5-10. |
| 2 | The element of jurisdiction in the first examination | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 11-16. |
| 3 | Administrative authority encroachment | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 17-21. |
| 4 | capacity to sue | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 22-42. |
| 5 | A definitive and mandatory action that may be subject to administrative litigation | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 43-49. |
| 6 | term of litigation | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 50-66. |
| 7 | hostility | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 67-72. |
| 8 | Compliance with Articles 3 and 5 of the Administrative Procedure Law | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 73-77. |
| 9 | Opening the case and reviewing the petition | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 78-86. |
| 10 | The principle of ex officio investigation in administrative justice | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 82-84. |
| 11 | Order of first review | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 85-86. |
| 12 | Decisions upon review | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 87-108. |
| 13 | Recourse against the decisions to be rendered upon the first review | Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019, pp. 110-113. |
| 14 | Judicial decision review | Examines the sample judicial decision by researching |
| Resources |
| Halit Eyüp Özdemir, First Review on Petitions in Administrative Jurisdiction, Istanbul 2019. "Administrative Trial Procedure Law with Explanations and Notes" Prof. Dr. Turan Yıldırım, Gül Fiş Üstün, Istanbul 2020. "Turkish Administrative Trial Law" Bahtiyar Akyılmaz, Murat Sezginer, Cemil Kaya, Istanbul 2022. |
Course Contribution to Program Qualifications
| Course Contribution to Program Qualifications | |||||||
| No | Program Qualification | Contribution Level | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| 1 | PY1) In light of the current developments in the field of public law, develop and deepen the knowledge about the main sources, legislation and jurisprudence which related to the public law. | X | |||||
| 2 | PY2) With understanding relationships among concept, institution and method that related to disciplines of public law, come up with original solutions by using knowledge requiring proficiency on analysis, synthesis and assessment of new and complex ideas. | X | |||||
| 3 | PY3) Evaluate and use new information within the public law in a systematic approach | X | |||||
| 4 | PY4) Evaluate innovative aproach an already known knowledge about public law or research and implement an original subject. | X | |||||
| 5 | PY5) Solve the problems encountered in the legal theory and practice by using research methods that specific to field of law. | X | |||||
| 6 | PY6) Evaluate innovative aproach an already known knowledge about public law or carry out an independent study which needs expertise in the field of public law and its sub-disciplines. | ||||||
| 7 | PY7) Develop different perspectives and take responsibility to solve complex issues which require expertise and encountered in the field of public law and its sub-disciplines. | X | |||||
| 8 | PY8) Develop new ideas and methods in the field of public law by using high level mental processes such as creative and critical thinking, problem solving and decision making. | X | |||||
| 9 | PY9) Defend original views when exchanging ideas in the field of public law and itssub-disciplines with professionals and communicate effectively by showing competence in the field. | ||||||
| 10 | PY10)Ability to communicate and discuss orally, in written and visually with peers by using a foreign language at least at a level of European Language Portfolio C1 General Level. | ||||||
| 11 | PY11) Demonstrate functional interaction by using strategic decision making processes in solving problems encountered in the field of law. | X | |||||
| 12 | PY12) With developing understanding of honesty, justice and ethics are required to be lawyer, teach around them. | X | |||||
| 13 | PY13)Contribute to the solution finding process regarding social, scientific, cultural and ethical problems in the field of law and support the development of these values. | X | |||||
Assessment Methods
| Contribution Level | Absolute Evaluation | |
| Rate of Midterm Exam to Success | 50 | |
| Rate of Final Exam to Success | 50 | |
| Total | 100 | |