Course Detail
Course Detail
Course Description
| Course | Code | Semester | T+P (Hour) | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRITICAL and ANALYTICAL THINKING | İM3210194 | Spring Semester | 2+0 | 2 | 4 |
| Course Program |
| Prerequisites Courses | |
| Recommended Elective Courses |
| Language of Course | Turkish |
| Course Level | First Cycle (Bachelor's Degree) |
| Course Type | Elective |
| Course Coordinator | Assoc.Prof. Metin KAYA |
| Name of Lecturer(s) | Assist.Prof. Melisa KARAKAYA ÖZTÜRK |
| Assistant(s) | |
| Aim | Enable the students to have critical thinking which is a kind of thinking in which they question, analyze, interpret, evaluate and make a judgment about what they read, hear, say, or write |
| Course Content | This course contains; The description of critical thinking and analytic thinking ,The description of critical thinking and analytic thinking ,Discrimination of the critical thinking and non-critical thinking ,Thinking, the brain which use for the thinking and how the brain learn? ,What are the competents of the 21. century? In this sense the importance of the critical thinking and analytic thinking ,The importance of the critical and analytic thinking for children ,How we must organize the activities of the critical and analytic thinking? ,The relationships between asking questions and analytic thinking,The sequential and formal request thinking at critical and analytic thinking,The effects of the critical and analytic thinking ,Induction and deduction ,Literature references in this field and critical and analytic thinking in professional development ,Critical and analytic reading, listening, speaking and writing ,The characteristics of the teacher profession. |
| Course Learning Outcomes | Teaching Methods | Assessment Methods |
| Question, analyze, interpret, evaluate and make a judgment about what they read, hear, say, or write. | 10 | A, C, E, F |
| Have the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including their own. | 10 | A, C, E, F |
| Asks questions, gather relevant information, think through solutions and conclusions, consider alternative systems of thought, communicate effectively. | 10 | A, C, E, F |
| Develops decision-making skills to weigh different factors, consider alternatives, and make informed choices based on evidence and reasoning. | 10 | A, C, E, F |
| Improves communication skills, both written and verbal, by emphasizing clarity, coherence, and logical organization of ideas. | 10 | A, C, E, F |
| Promotes collaborative thinking and the ability to work effectively in a team by encouraging students to consider multiple viewpoints and engage in constructive dialogue. | 10 | A, C, E, F |
| Teaching Methods: | 10: Discussion Method |
| Assessment Methods: | A: Traditional Written Exam, C: Multiple-Choice Exam, E: Homework, F: Project Task |
Course Outline
| Order | Subjects | Preliminary Work |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The description of critical thinking and analytic thinking | Talking about expectations from the course |
| 2 | The description of critical thinking and analytic thinking | Reading recommended articles on Critical and Analytical thinking |
| 3 | Discrimination of the critical thinking and non-critical thinking | Creating a concept map of critical and non-critical thinking characteristics |
| 4 | Thinking, the brain which use for the thinking and how the brain learn? | Reading articles about brain and thinking |
| 5 | What are the competents of the 21. century? In this sense the importance of the critical thinking and analytic thinking | Reading articles about 21st century competences and critical and analytical thinking |
| 6 | The importance of the critical and analytic thinking for children | Child observation within the scope of Critical and Analytical Thinking |
| 7 | How we must organize the activities of the critical and analytic thinking? | Examination of activities that develop critical and analytical thinking for children |
| 8 | The relationships between asking questions and analytic thinking | Developing thinking with a question-answer technique on a prominent subject |
| 9 | The sequential and formal request thinking at critical and analytic thinking | Reading articles on critical and analytical thinking methods and factors affecting thinking |
| 10 | The effects of the critical and analytic thinking | Preparation of a summary report on the articles read on critical and analytical thinking methods and factors affecting thinking |
| 11 | Induction and deduction | Reading articles on induction and deduction |
| 12 | Literature references in this field and critical and analytic thinking in professional development | Brainstorming on critical and analytical thinking and professional development |
| 13 | Critical and analytic reading, listening, speaking and writing | Reading articles about critical reading, listening, speaking and writing |
| 14 | The characteristics of the teacher profession | Evaluation of the teaching profession and the necessity of critical and analytical thinking |
| Resources |
| Asking the Right Questions, A Guide to Critical Thinking , M. Neil Browne Stuart M. Keeley ,Bowling Green State University |
Course Contribution to Program Qualifications
| Course Contribution to Program Qualifications | |||||||
| No | Program Qualification | Contribution Level | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| 1 | It compares the fundamental theoretical frameworks in the field of elementary mathematics education (constructivism, cognitive development theories, models of mathematical thinking) along with their strengths and weaknesses. | ||||||
| 2 | It compares the national mathematics curriculum (MEB) with international frameworks (NCTM, PISA, TIMSS) in terms of learning objectives and content areas. | ||||||
| 3 | Explains the principles of assessment and evaluation, research methods, and ethical guidelines relevant to their profession, as well as their practical applications. | ||||||
| 4 | Applies appropriate pedagogical interventions in connection with the training received regarding the instructional situations and challenges encountered in the field of elementary mathematics education. | ||||||
| 5 | By analyzing students' misconceptions and learning difficulties in mathematics, they design appropriate teaching strategies and materials to address them. | ||||||
| 6 | Solves professional problems related to mathematics education independently using scientific methods. | ||||||
| 7 | Explains proposed solutions to professional challenges to both expert and non-expert stakeholders, supported by quantitative and qualitative data. | ||||||
| 8 | By formulating a research question on a professional topic, they plan the appropriate research method. | ||||||
| 9 | Distinguishes between situations that fall within the scope of their professional duties and responsibilities and those that do not. | ||||||
| 10 | Monitors the instructional activities and implementation process aimed at the development of the students under their supervision. | ||||||
| 11 | Guides the professional development process by integrating this information in line with national and international developments and research findings in mathematics education. | ||||||
| 12 | By interpreting the results of their own teaching practices, they develop recommendations for professional development. | ||||||
| 13 | Explains proposed solutions to professional challenges to both expert and non-expert stakeholders, supported by quantitative and qualitative data. | ||||||
| 14 | Ensures compliance with research ethics, professional ethics for teachers, and national education regulations in their professional practice. | ||||||
| 15 | In the math classroom, we plan for an equitable and inclusive learning environment, activities that support each student’s mathematical potential, and the necessary safety measures regarding workplace safety. | ||||||
| 16 | In mathematics instruction, they use dynamic software (GeoGebra, Desmos, etc.), learning management systems, and other information and communication technologies at a level equivalent to at least the ECDL Advanced Level. | ||||||
Assessment Methods
| Contribution Level | Absolute Evaluation | |
| Rate of Midterm Exam to Success | 40 | |
| Rate of Final Exam to Success | 60 | |
| Total | 100 | |
| ECTS / Workload Table | ||||||
| Activities | Number of | Duration(Hour) | Total Workload(Hour) | |||
| Course Hours | 14 | 2 | 28 | |||
| Guided Problem Solving | 14 | 2 | 28 | |||
| Resolution of Homework Problems and Submission as a Report | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Term Project | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Presentation of Project / Seminar | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Quiz | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Midterm Exam | 16 | 2 | 32 | |||
| General Exam | 16 | 2 | 32 | |||
| Performance Task, Maintenance Plan | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Total Workload(Hour) | 120 | |||||
| Dersin AKTS Kredisi = Toplam İş Yükü (Saat)/30*=(120/30) | 4 | |||||
| ECTS of the course: 30 hours of work is counted as 1 ECTS credit. | ||||||
Detail Informations of the Course
Course Description
| Course | Code | Semester | T+P (Hour) | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRITICAL and ANALYTICAL THINKING | İM3210194 | Spring Semester | 2+0 | 2 | 4 |
| Course Program |
| Prerequisites Courses | |
| Recommended Elective Courses |
| Language of Course | Turkish |
| Course Level | First Cycle (Bachelor's Degree) |
| Course Type | Elective |
| Course Coordinator | Assoc.Prof. Metin KAYA |
| Name of Lecturer(s) | Assist.Prof. Melisa KARAKAYA ÖZTÜRK |
| Assistant(s) | |
| Aim | Enable the students to have critical thinking which is a kind of thinking in which they question, analyze, interpret, evaluate and make a judgment about what they read, hear, say, or write |
| Course Content | This course contains; The description of critical thinking and analytic thinking ,The description of critical thinking and analytic thinking ,Discrimination of the critical thinking and non-critical thinking ,Thinking, the brain which use for the thinking and how the brain learn? ,What are the competents of the 21. century? In this sense the importance of the critical thinking and analytic thinking ,The importance of the critical and analytic thinking for children ,How we must organize the activities of the critical and analytic thinking? ,The relationships between asking questions and analytic thinking,The sequential and formal request thinking at critical and analytic thinking,The effects of the critical and analytic thinking ,Induction and deduction ,Literature references in this field and critical and analytic thinking in professional development ,Critical and analytic reading, listening, speaking and writing ,The characteristics of the teacher profession. |
| Course Learning Outcomes | Teaching Methods | Assessment Methods |
| Question, analyze, interpret, evaluate and make a judgment about what they read, hear, say, or write. | 10 | A, C, E, F |
| Have the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including their own. | 10 | A, C, E, F |
| Asks questions, gather relevant information, think through solutions and conclusions, consider alternative systems of thought, communicate effectively. | 10 | A, C, E, F |
| Develops decision-making skills to weigh different factors, consider alternatives, and make informed choices based on evidence and reasoning. | 10 | A, C, E, F |
| Improves communication skills, both written and verbal, by emphasizing clarity, coherence, and logical organization of ideas. | 10 | A, C, E, F |
| Promotes collaborative thinking and the ability to work effectively in a team by encouraging students to consider multiple viewpoints and engage in constructive dialogue. | 10 | A, C, E, F |
| Teaching Methods: | 10: Discussion Method |
| Assessment Methods: | A: Traditional Written Exam, C: Multiple-Choice Exam, E: Homework, F: Project Task |
Course Outline
| Order | Subjects | Preliminary Work |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The description of critical thinking and analytic thinking | Talking about expectations from the course |
| 2 | The description of critical thinking and analytic thinking | Reading recommended articles on Critical and Analytical thinking |
| 3 | Discrimination of the critical thinking and non-critical thinking | Creating a concept map of critical and non-critical thinking characteristics |
| 4 | Thinking, the brain which use for the thinking and how the brain learn? | Reading articles about brain and thinking |
| 5 | What are the competents of the 21. century? In this sense the importance of the critical thinking and analytic thinking | Reading articles about 21st century competences and critical and analytical thinking |
| 6 | The importance of the critical and analytic thinking for children | Child observation within the scope of Critical and Analytical Thinking |
| 7 | How we must organize the activities of the critical and analytic thinking? | Examination of activities that develop critical and analytical thinking for children |
| 8 | The relationships between asking questions and analytic thinking | Developing thinking with a question-answer technique on a prominent subject |
| 9 | The sequential and formal request thinking at critical and analytic thinking | Reading articles on critical and analytical thinking methods and factors affecting thinking |
| 10 | The effects of the critical and analytic thinking | Preparation of a summary report on the articles read on critical and analytical thinking methods and factors affecting thinking |
| 11 | Induction and deduction | Reading articles on induction and deduction |
| 12 | Literature references in this field and critical and analytic thinking in professional development | Brainstorming on critical and analytical thinking and professional development |
| 13 | Critical and analytic reading, listening, speaking and writing | Reading articles about critical reading, listening, speaking and writing |
| 14 | The characteristics of the teacher profession | Evaluation of the teaching profession and the necessity of critical and analytical thinking |
| Resources |
| Asking the Right Questions, A Guide to Critical Thinking , M. Neil Browne Stuart M. Keeley ,Bowling Green State University |
Course Contribution to Program Qualifications
| Course Contribution to Program Qualifications | |||||||
| No | Program Qualification | Contribution Level | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| 1 | It compares the fundamental theoretical frameworks in the field of elementary mathematics education (constructivism, cognitive development theories, models of mathematical thinking) along with their strengths and weaknesses. | ||||||
| 2 | It compares the national mathematics curriculum (MEB) with international frameworks (NCTM, PISA, TIMSS) in terms of learning objectives and content areas. | ||||||
| 3 | Explains the principles of assessment and evaluation, research methods, and ethical guidelines relevant to their profession, as well as their practical applications. | ||||||
| 4 | Applies appropriate pedagogical interventions in connection with the training received regarding the instructional situations and challenges encountered in the field of elementary mathematics education. | ||||||
| 5 | By analyzing students' misconceptions and learning difficulties in mathematics, they design appropriate teaching strategies and materials to address them. | ||||||
| 6 | Solves professional problems related to mathematics education independently using scientific methods. | ||||||
| 7 | Explains proposed solutions to professional challenges to both expert and non-expert stakeholders, supported by quantitative and qualitative data. | ||||||
| 8 | By formulating a research question on a professional topic, they plan the appropriate research method. | ||||||
| 9 | Distinguishes between situations that fall within the scope of their professional duties and responsibilities and those that do not. | ||||||
| 10 | Monitors the instructional activities and implementation process aimed at the development of the students under their supervision. | ||||||
| 11 | Guides the professional development process by integrating this information in line with national and international developments and research findings in mathematics education. | ||||||
| 12 | By interpreting the results of their own teaching practices, they develop recommendations for professional development. | ||||||
| 13 | Explains proposed solutions to professional challenges to both expert and non-expert stakeholders, supported by quantitative and qualitative data. | ||||||
| 14 | Ensures compliance with research ethics, professional ethics for teachers, and national education regulations in their professional practice. | ||||||
| 15 | In the math classroom, we plan for an equitable and inclusive learning environment, activities that support each student’s mathematical potential, and the necessary safety measures regarding workplace safety. | ||||||
| 16 | In mathematics instruction, they use dynamic software (GeoGebra, Desmos, etc.), learning management systems, and other information and communication technologies at a level equivalent to at least the ECDL Advanced Level. | ||||||
Assessment Methods
| Contribution Level | Absolute Evaluation | |
| Rate of Midterm Exam to Success | 40 | |
| Rate of Final Exam to Success | 60 | |
| Total | 100 | |