Course Detail
Course Description
Course | Code | Semester | T+P (Hour) | Credit | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TURKISH LANGUAGE II | - | Spring Semester | 3+0 | 3 | 5 |
Course Program |
Prerequisites Courses | |
Recommended Elective Courses |
Language of Course | Turkish |
Course Level | First Cycle (Bachelor's Degree) |
Course Type | Required |
Course Coordinator | Prof.Dr. Abdullah Azmi BİLGİN |
Name of Lecturer(s) | Prof.Dr. Abdullah Azmi BİLGİN, Lect. Kübra GÜRSOY |
Assistant(s) | |
Aim | Features of academic language and writing; use of definitions, concepts and terms in academic papers; objective and subjective expression; structure and types of academic texts (articles, reports and scientific abstracts, etc.); claim, write proposition (verify, defend or oppose a thought); formal characteristics of scientific reports and articles; cascading report writing; description, discussion, intertext association, reference (citation and footnote, bibliography creation); writing titles, summarizing, keyword writing; ethical principles to be considered in scientific articles; academic text writing applications. |
Course Content | This course contains; Features of academic language and writing,Definition in academic writings,Concept and terms,Objective and subjective narration, Structure of academic texts,Types of academic texts; articles, reports and scientific abstracts, etc.,Proposition, confirming, defending, or opposing an idea,Formal features of scientific reports,Formal features of scientific reports,The steps of writing a report; explanation, discussion,Steps of writing a report; Establishing relationships between texts, citing references, citation and footnotes, bibliography,Heading, summarizing, keyword writing,Ethical principles to be considered in scientific articles,Academic writing practices. |
Dersin Öğrenme Kazanımları | Teaching Methods | Assessment Methods |
Students can express their feelings, thoughts, knowledge, expectations, experiences verbally and in writing. | 37 | A |
Students can use the Turkish equivalents of profession and science field terms. | 37 | A |
Students can produce Turkish texts in the field of science, art and culture. | 37 | A |
Teaching Methods: | 37: Computer-Internet Supported Instruction |
Assessment Methods: | A: Traditional Written Exam |
Course Outline
Order | Subjects | Preliminary Work |
---|---|---|
1 | Features of academic language and writing | Study notes |
2 | Definition in academic writings | Study notes |
3 | Concept and terms | Study notes |
4 | Objective and subjective narration | Study notes |
5 | Structure of academic texts | Study notes |
6 | Types of academic texts; articles, reports and scientific abstracts, etc. | Study notes |
7 | Proposition, confirming, defending, or opposing an idea | Study notes |
8 | Formal features of scientific reports | Study notes |
9 | Formal features of scientific reports | Study notes |
10 | The steps of writing a report; explanation, discussion | Study notes |
11 | Steps of writing a report; Establishing relationships between texts, citing references, citation and footnotes, bibliography | Study notes |
12 | Heading, summarizing, keyword writing | Study notes |
13 | Ethical principles to be considered in scientific articles | Study notes |
14 | Academic writing practices | Study notes |
Resources |
Prof. Dr. Coşkun Ak,Türk Dili,Nobel Yayınları, 2006 Prof.Dr. Mustafa Özkan, Dr. Osman Esin, Dr. Hatice Tören,Yükseköğretimde Türk Dili, Filiz Kitabevi, İstanbul, 2001. Prof.Dr. Kemal Yavuz, Prof. Dr. Kazım Yetiş, Prof. Dr. Necat Birinci, Üniversitede Türk Dili ve Kompozisyon Dersleri, Bayrak Yayınevi, İstanbul,1999. Prof Dr. Muharrem Ergin, Üniversiteler İçin Türk Dili, Bayrak Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2001. Porf. Dr. Zeynep Korkmaz, Prof. Dr. Ahmet Ercilasun, Prof.Dr. Hamza Zülfikar, Prof. Dr. İsmail Parlatır, Prof.Dr. Mehmet Akalın, Prof Dr. Tuncer Gülensoy, Prof Dr. Necat Birinci, Türk Dili ve Kompozisyon Bilgileri, Yargı Yayınevi, Ankara,2001. Prof. Dr. Şerif Aktaş, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Osman Gündüz, Yazılı ve Sözlü Anlatım, Akçağ Yayınevi, Ankara,2001. |
Course Contribution to Program Qualifications
Course Contribution to Program Qualifications | |||||||
No | Program Qualification | Contribution Level | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
1 | Can verbally express the specific terms and concepts in the field of teaching English | ||||||
2 | Can verbally express the basic concepts, principles and techniques in the field of teaching English | ||||||
3 | Can list both the strenghts and weaknesses of each theory by means of comparing the field related theorie. | ||||||
4 | Can apply the necessary techniques in solving the problems encountered in the field of teaching English | X | |||||
5 | Can analyze and solve a field-related problem by following scientific steps. | X | |||||
6 | Can solve a field-related problem on his own | X | |||||
7 | Can distinguish the situations that are within his responsibilities and duties from the ones that are not and can take necessary steps | X | |||||
8 | Follows the developments in his field in the light of life-long learning principle | X | |||||
9 | Consults colleagues in the process of finding solutions to a field-related problem. | X | |||||
10 | Can formulate a problem encountered both verbally and non-verbally. | X | |||||
11 | By having social responsibility, makes use of professional experiences in solving problems. | X | |||||
12 | Knows the basic terminology | X | |||||
13 | Applies the basic skills | ||||||
14 | Can effectively use language learning strategies | ||||||
15 | Knows the characteristics and structure of human language | ||||||
16 | Has native like fluency | ||||||
17 | Considers the needs of learners, their level of development, age, and learning strategies in designing a syllabus, | ||||||
18 | Has the ability to design activities that help learners' improving their knowledge of English grammar and vocabulary. |
Assessment Methods
Contribution Level | Absolute Evaluation | |
Rate of Midterm Exam to Success | 20 | |
Rate of Final Exam to Success | 80 | |
Total | 100 |
ECTS / Workload Table | ||||||
Activities | Number of | Duration(Hour) | Total Workload(Hour) | |||
Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 | |||
Guided Problem Solving | 14 | 2 | 28 | |||
Resolution of Homework Problems and Submission as a Report | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Term Project | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Presentation of Project / Seminar | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Quiz | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Midterm Exam | 1 | 40 | 40 | |||
General Exam | 1 | 40 | 40 | |||
Performance Task, Maintenance Plan | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Total Workload(Hour) | 150 | |||||
Dersin AKTS Kredisi = Toplam İş Yükü (Saat)/30*=(150/30) | 5 | |||||
ECTS of the course: 30 hours of work is counted as 1 ECTS credit. |
Detail Informations of the Course
Course Description
Course | Code | Semester | T+P (Hour) | Credit | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TURKISH LANGUAGE II | - | Spring Semester | 3+0 | 3 | 5 |
Course Program |
Prerequisites Courses | |
Recommended Elective Courses |
Language of Course | Turkish |
Course Level | First Cycle (Bachelor's Degree) |
Course Type | Required |
Course Coordinator | Prof.Dr. Abdullah Azmi BİLGİN |
Name of Lecturer(s) | Prof.Dr. Abdullah Azmi BİLGİN, Lect. Kübra GÜRSOY |
Assistant(s) | |
Aim | Features of academic language and writing; use of definitions, concepts and terms in academic papers; objective and subjective expression; structure and types of academic texts (articles, reports and scientific abstracts, etc.); claim, write proposition (verify, defend or oppose a thought); formal characteristics of scientific reports and articles; cascading report writing; description, discussion, intertext association, reference (citation and footnote, bibliography creation); writing titles, summarizing, keyword writing; ethical principles to be considered in scientific articles; academic text writing applications. |
Course Content | This course contains; Features of academic language and writing,Definition in academic writings,Concept and terms,Objective and subjective narration, Structure of academic texts,Types of academic texts; articles, reports and scientific abstracts, etc.,Proposition, confirming, defending, or opposing an idea,Formal features of scientific reports,Formal features of scientific reports,The steps of writing a report; explanation, discussion,Steps of writing a report; Establishing relationships between texts, citing references, citation and footnotes, bibliography,Heading, summarizing, keyword writing,Ethical principles to be considered in scientific articles,Academic writing practices. |
Dersin Öğrenme Kazanımları | Teaching Methods | Assessment Methods |
Students can express their feelings, thoughts, knowledge, expectations, experiences verbally and in writing. | 37 | A |
Students can use the Turkish equivalents of profession and science field terms. | 37 | A |
Students can produce Turkish texts in the field of science, art and culture. | 37 | A |
Teaching Methods: | 37: Computer-Internet Supported Instruction |
Assessment Methods: | A: Traditional Written Exam |
Course Outline
Order | Subjects | Preliminary Work |
---|---|---|
1 | Features of academic language and writing | Study notes |
2 | Definition in academic writings | Study notes |
3 | Concept and terms | Study notes |
4 | Objective and subjective narration | Study notes |
5 | Structure of academic texts | Study notes |
6 | Types of academic texts; articles, reports and scientific abstracts, etc. | Study notes |
7 | Proposition, confirming, defending, or opposing an idea | Study notes |
8 | Formal features of scientific reports | Study notes |
9 | Formal features of scientific reports | Study notes |
10 | The steps of writing a report; explanation, discussion | Study notes |
11 | Steps of writing a report; Establishing relationships between texts, citing references, citation and footnotes, bibliography | Study notes |
12 | Heading, summarizing, keyword writing | Study notes |
13 | Ethical principles to be considered in scientific articles | Study notes |
14 | Academic writing practices | Study notes |
Resources |
Prof. Dr. Coşkun Ak,Türk Dili,Nobel Yayınları, 2006 Prof.Dr. Mustafa Özkan, Dr. Osman Esin, Dr. Hatice Tören,Yükseköğretimde Türk Dili, Filiz Kitabevi, İstanbul, 2001. Prof.Dr. Kemal Yavuz, Prof. Dr. Kazım Yetiş, Prof. Dr. Necat Birinci, Üniversitede Türk Dili ve Kompozisyon Dersleri, Bayrak Yayınevi, İstanbul,1999. Prof Dr. Muharrem Ergin, Üniversiteler İçin Türk Dili, Bayrak Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2001. Porf. Dr. Zeynep Korkmaz, Prof. Dr. Ahmet Ercilasun, Prof.Dr. Hamza Zülfikar, Prof. Dr. İsmail Parlatır, Prof.Dr. Mehmet Akalın, Prof Dr. Tuncer Gülensoy, Prof Dr. Necat Birinci, Türk Dili ve Kompozisyon Bilgileri, Yargı Yayınevi, Ankara,2001. Prof. Dr. Şerif Aktaş, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Osman Gündüz, Yazılı ve Sözlü Anlatım, Akçağ Yayınevi, Ankara,2001. |
Course Contribution to Program Qualifications
Course Contribution to Program Qualifications | |||||||
No | Program Qualification | Contribution Level | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
1 | Can verbally express the specific terms and concepts in the field of teaching English | ||||||
2 | Can verbally express the basic concepts, principles and techniques in the field of teaching English | ||||||
3 | Can list both the strenghts and weaknesses of each theory by means of comparing the field related theorie. | ||||||
4 | Can apply the necessary techniques in solving the problems encountered in the field of teaching English | X | |||||
5 | Can analyze and solve a field-related problem by following scientific steps. | X | |||||
6 | Can solve a field-related problem on his own | X | |||||
7 | Can distinguish the situations that are within his responsibilities and duties from the ones that are not and can take necessary steps | X | |||||
8 | Follows the developments in his field in the light of life-long learning principle | X | |||||
9 | Consults colleagues in the process of finding solutions to a field-related problem. | X | |||||
10 | Can formulate a problem encountered both verbally and non-verbally. | X | |||||
11 | By having social responsibility, makes use of professional experiences in solving problems. | X | |||||
12 | Knows the basic terminology | X | |||||
13 | Applies the basic skills | ||||||
14 | Can effectively use language learning strategies | ||||||
15 | Knows the characteristics and structure of human language | ||||||
16 | Has native like fluency | ||||||
17 | Considers the needs of learners, their level of development, age, and learning strategies in designing a syllabus, | ||||||
18 | Has the ability to design activities that help learners' improving their knowledge of English grammar and vocabulary. |
Assessment Methods
Contribution Level | Absolute Evaluation | |
Rate of Midterm Exam to Success | 20 | |
Rate of Final Exam to Success | 80 | |
Total | 100 |